Case study • our best one so far
Every dollar followed from the ad to the booked estimate to the sold job, marked by the client's own sales team.
August 2026 • the whole path
All figures are August 2026, Los Angeles and Portland campaigns. Ad spend and leads from Meta Ads Manager, Inspire campaigns only. Estimates from the shared lead sheet. Sold jobs and revenue from the client's sales sheet, marked by the client's own sales team. Published with the client's permission.
Leads came in, but follow-up was slow and nobody could see which ads earned their money. When we audited the lead sheet, only 27 percent of 158 leads had ever received a call.
1. Rebuilt the ad account around the offers homeowners actually respond to.
2. Produced AI-made video and image creative, tested weekly by cost per lead.
3. Set up tracking from the form to the booked estimate to the sold job, marked by the client's own team.
The system started in Los Angeles, where it ran 284 leads at $46.07 per lead. It worked well enough that the client expanded to Portland on the same playbook. August was the first month with the full money trail tracked end to end, and the best month of the engagement so far.
One sold job averaged $51,858. Getting one cost $3,873.05 in ads. That gap is the whole argument for tracking past the lead.
Yaniv Inspire@Yaniv_Inspire
You'll probably enjoy working with us if...
You'd rather hear the truth about your numbers than see a pretty report.
You choose the right partner over the cheapest one.
You want a relationship that lasts, not a campaign that ends.
If that's you, you already know.
This is our best engagement to date, shown because it is the clearest picture of the full system working. Results vary by market, offer, budget, follow-up, and sales process.